Veteran Dem defeats scandal-plagued former lawmaker, progressive challenger in Trump's backyard
Everything below was taken directly out of the reporting and the official record — quotations word for word, legislation straight from Congress.gov. The Record wrote none of it and takes no position on any of it.
From the Article
The opening of the original reporting, reproduced word for word and bounded on purpose — the outlet that wrote it should get the full read.
Reported by Fox News. The paragraphs below are the opening of that article, reproduced word for word — not a summary, and not the whole piece.
During a Friday appearance on "CNN News Central," Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., rebuked an op-ed from The New York Times which argued that Democrats "will lose in 2028 unless they change course now."
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has bested a young progressive challenger and an embattled former lawmaker after a hard-fought primary characterized by its racial overtones.
Schultz, a 21-year veteran of the House, stressed her seniority on the campaign trail alongside her ability to deliver services to constituents and secure federal funding for her district. To secure her primary victory, Schultz bested former Rep.
Continue reading at Fox News →How Other Outlets Covered It
Other outlets' stories about the same event, matched by the distinctive wording they share. Compare the headlines — what one outlet leads with is itself information.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Wins Democratic Primary in Redrawn Florida District
The congresswoman won her party’s nomination in Florida’s 20th District over several Black candidates who sharply criticized her decision to run there.
In Florida, Wasserman Schultz sparks a debate over what representation means in diverse districts
Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is running for reelection in a new Florida district after Republicans redrew the congressional map
Under new Florida maps, a White Democrat aims to win a heavily Black district
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is competing in a racially thorny primary in which everyone seems to think experience is important — but they don’t agree on what kind.