Everything here comes from the public record — Congress.gov, the House Clerk, the Senate, the Federal Register, and news outlets' own feeds. How this works
The Record
← News
News Reporting· MS NOW Published Aug 24, 2026

Supreme Court backs Trump for now on mail-in voting executive order, but ‘time will tell’

Read full story →

Everything below was taken directly out of the reporting and the official record — quotations word for word, legislation straight from Congress.gov. The Record wrote none of it and takes no position on any of it.

From the Article

Reported by MS NOW. The paragraphs below are the opening of that article, reproduced word for word — not a summary, and not the whole piece.

California and other blue states had warned of “extreme” consequences if the high court approved Trump’s suppressive voting measures ahead of the midterms.

The Supreme Court’s GOP-appointed majority on Monday granted the Trump administration ’s request to lift a lower court injunction that had blocked the administration from implementing an executive order that blue states said carries extreme risks for the midterm elections.

The high court emphasized that its action doesn’t mean that any measure taken by the administration to implement President Donald Trump’s order will necessarily be lawful.

Continue reading at MS NOW →

Quoted in This Article

“obvious goal is to interfere with the Plaintiff States’ practices and prerogatives in a manner that the Constitution does not authorize, it is both a serious legal error and a grave misuse of our equitable emergency powers to let the Executive proceed even one step further.”

Ketanji Brown Jackson Justice